Tuesday 4 August 2015

Determining the Behavior and Usefulness of Plasma, their Uses in Daily Life, and Other Appearances


In order to determine the behavior and usefulness of the plasma, we have to take into account: 

  •         The type of atoms in the plasma
  •         The ratio of ionized particles to neutral particles
  •         The particle energies

These unique behaviors and usefulness result in different types of plasma, characteristics and behaviors which causes them to be useful in several applications in our daily lives and other appearances around the world.

Uses in our daily life:
  • Neon Lights
  • Fluorescent Lamps
  • Tesla Coil - A form of induction coil for producing high-frequency alternating currents

Tesla Coils
Neon Lights
Other appearances:
  • Lightning
  • Aurora - A natural light display in the sky, seen in the Arctic and Antarctic regions.
  • Solar Wind - A stream of charged particles, mainly electrons and protons, flowing outward from the sun, through the solar system at speeds as high as 900 km/s and at a temperature of 1 million degrees Celsius.
  • Stars
  • Interstellar clouds - Accumulation of gas, plasma, and dust in galaxies.

Interstellar Clouds

Solar Wind

Aurora

















Kasen

What is Plasma?

Plasma is one of the four states of matter with the others being solid, liquid, and gas but plasma has properties that differ of the other three states of matter. They are by far the most common form of matter and are also estimated to constitute more than 99 percent of the visible universe.

Plasma consists of free-moving electrons and ions; in other words, atoms that have lost electrons after being ionized. Therefore, energy is needed to separate the electrons from the atoms to make plasma. The types of energy used are thermal, electrical, or light (ultraviolet light or intense visible light from lasers). Once there are enough atoms that have been ionized to affect the electrical characteristics of the gas, it becomes plasma. But with lack of sustaining power, plasma recombines to a neutral gas.


There are several properties of plasma. First of all, it conducts electricity due to having a significant amount of free-moving particles so that it responds strongly to electromagnetic fields. Secondly, it does not have a definite shape or volume unless it’s in a container which is similar to gas. Thirdly, the temperature of plasma is usually measured in Kelvins or electronvolts (the amount of energy gained or lost by the charge of a single electron moved across a potential difference of one volt) and very high temperatures are usually needed in order to sustain ionization.

Information links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)#Definition
http://www.plasmacoalition.org/what.htm
http://www.plasmas.org/what-are-plasmas.htm
http://plasmauniverse.info/ubiquitous.html


Kasen

Introduction

For my topic that I will be working on, I chose to work on the topic of Plasma. Plasma is a very general term so I won’t be going into the specific points as it contains too many details that I can’t understand. So I’ll only be focusing on the more general and simpler points that define plasma.

In my second blog, I’ll be posting the information I’ve gathered from several websites that defines what plasma is. Then, in my third blog I’ll be posting information on determining the usefulness and behaviors of plasma; as well as their appearances or uses in our everyday life.

Finally, I’ll be compiling all my information on my topic into a short PowerPoint presentation.

Thank You.

Kasen

Monday 3 August 2015

The Magic of Nuclear Fusion and Gravity in Stars

A few days ago, we started to embark on our final chapter of Physics for the IGCSE curriculum- Nuclear Physics. As challenging as it sounds, Nuclear Physics is not as tough as it seems. After referring to the textbook and reading articles about the formation of stars, I have found out that the formation of stars are more closely related to Nuclear Physics than I initially thought it was.

The formation of stars involves nuclear fusion. Before this fusion even begins, gravity is needed to pull the materials needed to form a star- clouds of gases and dust. The simplified definition of nuclear fusion (gathered from the textbook and the internet) is the joining of two atomic nuclei to form a larger nucleus.

The baby steps to the formation of stars: 

  • Gravity pulls dust and clouds of gases together.
  • During this process, the volume of gases and dust increases, resulting to an increase in pressure.
  • When the temperature is at its optimum, nuclear reactions begin. This is when nuclear fusion is added into the equation.

*From what we learnt in Physics, an increase in pressure results in an increase in temperature.

These nuclear reactions are what fuels the stars, keeping the star glowing hot. During nuclear fusion, a massive amount of energy is given out. The temperature of a star at this stage can easily reach 3000K to 4000K.

*3000K or 3000 Kelvins is equivalent to about 2726.85°C. 

Nuclear fusion in stars:

There are several complicated nuclear reactions that occur inside a star. However, the most frequently occurring reaction involves hydrogen nuclei joining to form helium nuclei.

nuclei collide and fuse together
The formation of helium through nuclear fusion.

Conditions inside a star which allows nuclear fusion to happen:

  1. High pressure
  2. High temperatures
All that you have read here is just the 'main sequence' of the star's life cycle. The star is stable at the main sequence of its life cycle as the forces acting on it (pressure from hot gases and gravity) are balanced. During the next blog post, we will explore what happens when all the hydrogen gases are used up and how mass affects a star. A star may form a black dwarf, or a black hole upon its death depending on its mass.
Star life cycle
The life cycle of a star.

Sources:
http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/how-do-stars-form-and-evolve/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/gcsebitesize/science/add_aqa/stars/lifecyclestarsrev1.shtml
http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/ast122/lectures/lec13.html
https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/AstronNotes/STARS.HTM

Thank you for reading
Joel


String Theory

Basically, string theory is trying to answer the age-old question of what is matter made from. For a long time, scientists as early as 600 BCE speculated as to what made up matter. Thales suggested that the world was made up of different forms of water whilst Anaximenes reasoned that the world was made of various forms of air. Democritus maintained that there was an indivisible particle called an 'atom', but his idea didn't take off as Aristotle proposed that matter was made of 4 elements: air, water, fire and earth. It was this idea of the 4 elements that held firm until the 1700s until modern science took off.

In the late 1700s, work by Lavoisier and Proust led Dalton to present a theory that all matter is composed of tiny particles called atoms. J.J. Later on in the late 1800s, electrons were discovered in cathode ray tubes which led scientists to think that atoms had a structure and had smaller parts. J.J. Thomson proposed the 'plum pudding' model of the atom (see Figure 1 below).

Figure 1: The 'Plum Pudding' model of the atom. (Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/26/Plum_pudding_model.svg/2000px-Plum_pudding_model.svg.png)

Another scientist called Ernest Rutherford had spent time working with radioactive materials and the radiation that they produce alongside Paul Viliard and decided to test Thomson's 'plum pudding' model. He hung up a very thin sheet of gold foil, surround it with detectors that could detect alpha particles (positively charged) and from the positions of the scattered alpha particles, he could decipher the structure of the atom. Rutherford found that most of the alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil, a few were scattered slightly deflected and a tiny amount bounced straight back (see Figure 2). He concluded that atoms were mainly empty space with all of the mass and positive charge and mass of the atom was contained in a tiny space at the very centre of the atom (see Figure 3). This space was called the nucleus.

Figure 2: Rutherford's gold foil experiment (Source: http://270c81.medialib.glogster.com/media/96/96afb330969ecc9eba4b9df5f3d79bfe2e406b92fbd04c183befd7b6fa226769/gold-foil-experiment.jpg)

Figure 3: The structure of an atom (Source: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi17ih9BlDiJsg6dhWeIj5wppwp2VUwPMp38tc1RBfvomCHRgedUtFPfYQnMQKerHaQvXcXOhvV9szze0FLhgfB-Dys3J9kHdRnbcEm3yEUfXKYbaEz5pMKNIQlLgNZW8LMnzk75EsY1Ag/s1600/Rurtherford.jpg)

Protons and neutrons were later discovered and which gave a more accurate account of what the structure of an atom looked like (see Figure 4).


Figure 4: Neutrons included in the model (Source: http://images.tutorcircle.com/cms/images/44/atom(1).png)

However, physicists still were not satisfied with this model which lead to further theories and experiments about what made up an atom. In the 1960s, some ideas that protons and neutrons were made up of smaller particles were proposed and tested leading to the discovery of quarks in CERN in the 1970s. Physicists then came up with the 'Standard Model' suggesting that matter is made up of quarks, leptons and gauge bosons (see Figure 5).

Figure 5: The Standard Model (Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/Standard_Model_of_Elementary_Particles.svg

However, this model has been suggested as being 'complicated' and not fundamental enough and theoretical physicists have speculated that all these particles are made up of a fundamental entities called 'strings' and proposed string theory. String theory suggests that all particles are made of bands of different length (related to their energy) and suggest that the way the strings have been tied or if they are open or closed leads to different particles being created (see Figure 6).

Figure 6: How an atom could be made up of 'strings' (Source: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/files/2008/04/3012_elegant_particles.gif)

In my presentation, I will outline the problems with string theory as well as explaining it in some more detail.

References
Riley, P. D. (2005). Checkpoint science 3. London: Hodder Education.
Smolin, L. (2006). The trouble with physics: the rise of string theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next. Mariner Books.

Forces of flight (continuation)

From Shawn

Hi everyone, welcome to my third and final blog post, in this post I would cover the remaining two forces that affect flight which are drag and thrust. In the last blog we looked at forces that affect the up and down movement of an aircraft, in this blog post we will discuss the forces that would cause an aircraft to move forward or backwards, and these two forces will also affect the speed and acceleration of the vehicle.

Drag: Drag is a frictional force that acts against an object moving through air, it is also commonly known as air resistance, as it opposes an object’s motion in the opposite direction. In order for an aircraft to progress forward, the drag must be smaller than a force acting in the same direction as the object’s motion, this would produce a resultant force forward. Drag is affected by the surface area of an object that is moving through air, the greater the surface area of an object, the greater the drag produced.



Thrust: The force results in a push that moves the aircraft forward, this force also opposes the drag force and if the trust is greater than the drag, the aircraft will progress forward. Most aircrafts acquire their thrust from the jet engines as these produce a large amount of force forward to counter the air resistance acting against the trust for the aircraft to move forward.



This concludes my blog regarding aerodynamics, apologies if the blogs are rather brief, this is largely due to the factor that the topic of aerodynamics is highly complex with several unfamiliar terms and formulas, therefore I have decided to look at it in a more simplified version. I have only focused on the forces in flight because I believe these forces link with the unit of forces and motion that we have studied in physics class already, this would create a clearer understanding and connection between these four forces and the crucial role that they play in the world of aerodynamics.

Thank you for checking out my blog! – Shawn Lai (Year 11 Bako)

Four forces of flight

From Shawn

Hello again and welcome to my second blog post regarding the four forces that affects flight, in this second post, we will look at the first two of four forces that has an effect on flight, this is a continuation from the post I did a few weeks ago regarding aerodynamics and its concepts.  As we have discussed in my previous post, aerodynamics plays an important role in our lives and one of those role is in the form of transportation. One of the vital forms of transportation in our lives is air travel, and air travel is dependent on the factor of flight, therefore today we will explore the four forces that allows flight to be possible. Keep in mind that the units for all these forces are in Newtons (N)
Weight:  The force of gravity acting upon an object, this force usually acts downwards as the object will be pulled with a force towards the centre of the Earth due to the attraction of Earth’s gravity.  For flight to be possible, this weight has to be countered greatly by an opposing force when the aircraft is taking off or flying in the air.



Lift: The force that causes an upward movement in the aircraft, the force acts upwards against the weight of the aircraft, and when the force caused by the lift is greater than the aircraft’s weight, this would result in the aircraft lifting off or increasing in altitude. In an Aeroplane, the lift is caused by the shape of the aircraft’s wings.

Lift in an Aeroplane’s wings: The shape of the aircraft’s wings are designed to change air pressure when in flight, it is able to do this because the top of the wing is curved more and the bottom of the wing is more flat, this causes air to flow over the top part of the wing much more efficiently than the bottom part. The result of this shape causes the air pressure on the top of the wing to be lower than the air pressure below the wing, therefore an upward movement would be caused due to the difference in pressure between the top and bottom parts of the wing.